Approve trades before a trading agent places them

Have your own risk team approve an order before an AI trading agent sends it.

How it works for this decision

Your agent sends

{
  "question": "Does this order fit the strategy?",
  "context": "Strategy: rebalance monthly to 60% stocks and 40% bonds, no single position above 5% of the portfolio. Proposed order: buy $48,000 of one stock, 12% of the portfolio.",
  "options": [
    "Fits the strategy",
    "Breaks the strategy"
  ],
  "route": "team"
}

Someone on your team sees

Your teamInternal

Does this order fit the strategy?

Strategy: rebalance monthly to 60% stocks and 40% bonds, no single position above 5% of the portfolio. Proposed order: buy $48,000 of one stock, 12% of the portfolio.

You get back

{
  "answer": "Breaks the strategy",
  "decided_by": "team",
  "reviewer": "risk@yourcompany.com"
}

The result shown is an example. Try answering the task yourself.

Why a human check

Trading agents act fast and on their own. A misread signal, a bad price feed or a prompt that slipped through can turn into an order far outside the limits you set, and a filled order is hard to take back.

Trading calls depend on your strategy and positions, so they stay with your own people. Plures sends the order to your risk team with your rules beside it, they decide in a tap on their phone, and your agent gets the answer. Orders well inside your limits go straight through.

Questions

Do verified people see our orders?

No. With route: "team" the order goes only to the people on your team, and every decision is recorded in your ledger.

Is Plures giving investment advice?

No. Your own team decides. Plures routes the order to them, records their call and returns it to your agent.

How do I start?

Get your API key at plures.si. Start with your own team: the first 50 decisions each month are free. Add credit when you want ID verified people on the rest, live right away.

More use cases